The Hidden Capacity of Your Social Brain


Hello Reader,

The other day, I looked at the long list of contacts in my phone. Hundreds of names—many I hadn’t messaged in years. It struck me that for all our digital reach, the people I keep up with, the ones I’d call when something big happens, still fit in a small circle. That’s Dunbar’s Number in action.

Dunbar’s Number is a mental model that suggests humans can only maintain about 150 meaningful relationships at once. It’s based on brain size and the cognitive limits of tracking emotional connections. You can know more people, but you can’t truly stay close with all of them.

That’s why this model lives inside Re:Mind, our toolkit for clearer thinking and better decisions. We hit $8.5K on Kickstarter and unlocked both stretch goals—thank you for backing it. Late pledges are still open.

Why Use It

Humans evolved in tribes, not cities. Dunbar’s Number reminds us that there are natural limits to how many people we can stay emotionally close to. Use this model to:

  • Prioritize meaningful relationships in a world of infinite connections
  • Build teams and communities that reflect cognitive reality
  • Rethink how scale affects culture, trust, and cohesion

When to Use It

This model is helpful anytime relationship depth matters:

  • When forming teams or restructuring departments
  • When curating your personal or professional circles
  • When evaluating how much community a platform or event can hold

How to Use It

In The Breakfast Club, five students from different social circles are forced to spend a Saturday together in detention. By the end of the day, meaningful bonds form—not because they shared interests, but because they had the time and space to connect. The film shows how intimacy and trust are more likely in small, well-bounded groups—something Dunbar’s Number helps us design for.

Here’s how to use this model with intention:

  1. Map your close circle: Who’s in your 5, 15, 50, and 150? (Think inner circle, sympathy group, clan, and tribe.)
  2. Design for intimacy: If you’re building a team, remember that smaller groups foster stronger trust.
  3. Reinforce bonds: Schedule low-stakes touchpoints to keep your essential ties alive.

Next Steps

Make a short list of people you want to stay close with this year. Not followers or fans, true connections. Then make time to reach out. Dunbar’s Number isn’t a limit to fear—it’s a design constraint to honor.

Where It Came From

Anthropologist Robin Dunbar proposed the number in the 1990s after studying primate brain sizes and social groups. He found that humans likely evolved to comfortably handle about 150 stable social relationships—a number that shows up across history in military units, Neolithic villages, and company org charts. The model has since been refined but continues to explain why emotional closeness doesn’t scale.

Until next time, keep exploring and questioning. Your unique perspective is your greatest asset.

Think Independently, JC

Share or Join 👉

Re:Mind with Juan Carlos

Re:Mind is a weekly newsletter exploring mental models and frameworks that help you think clearly and make better decisions. Each week, I share practical insights and tools that transform complex ideas into wisdom you can apply immediately. Join me in making better decisions, together.

Read more from Re:Mind with Juan Carlos

Hello Reader, You're in a meeting. The proposal sounds terrible: vague timelines, unclear ROI, obvious blind spots. You wait for someone else to say it. Surely everyone sees this. The room nods. The decision passes. You leave confused. The truth isn't that everyone agreed. The truth is, you assumed they did, and that assumption kept you quiet. That's the False Consensus Effect. Your brain projects your beliefs, values, and behaviors onto others, then treats that projection as if it were...

Hello Reader, Your competitor launched three features last quarter. You're still debating org structure. They pivoted twice in six months. Your product roadmap has seventeen stakeholder sign-offs. You diagnose: "Our organization is too complex. We need to streamline. Simplify. Flatten the hierarchy." Wrong problem. Your organization isn't complex. The market is. And you're blaming the ant when you should be reading the beach. This is Simon's Law of Complexity—and it reveals why most...

Hello Reader, You're researching vendors for a major decision. You compare features, check reviews, and build a spreadsheet. Three months later, you discover a critical requirement you never thought to ask about (and it's going to cost you). The problem wasn't what you didn't know. It was what you didn't know you didn't know. That's the Rumsfeld Matrix, though most people remember the quote without grasping the framework. It's about recognizing that the most dangerous territory in any...