Your Brain Has Two Speeds. Are You Using the Right One?


Hello Reader,

Earlier this year, I launched an ad campaign and watched clickthrough rates rise—but conversions didn’t budge. My gut said it was working. The data said otherwise. That tension between intuition and analysis? That’s the heart of fast and slow thinking.

Fast and Slow Thinking is the dual-system model of decision-making introduced by Daniel Kahneman. System 1 is fast, intuitive, and automatic. It helps us recognize faces, finish sentences, and react to threats. System 2 is slow, deliberate, and effortful. We use it to do math, analyze options, or question assumptions.

Both systems are essential. But better decisions begin with knowing when to engage which—and how they can deceive each other.

I’ve loaded 100 of the most powerful mental models into Re:Mind, a pocket-sized toolkit for better thinking. We wrapped our Kickstarter with $8.4K in pledges, and both stretch goals were met. If you missed the campaign, late pledges are still open.

Why Use It

Your brain usually gets it right without you noticing. However, the moments that matter most often require different thinking.

Understanding fast and slow thinking helps you:

  • Catch yourself when intuition overrides evidence
  • Slow down during decisions that require reflection
  • Recognize when effortful thinking is needed—and when it’s not

When to Use It

The magic of the model isn’t just knowing these systems exist—it’s knowing where they thrive. Below are a few moments where switching systems can change everything.

  • Creative sprints: Let System 1 flow without judgment—then review with System 2.
  • Hiring decisions: Pause the gut-feel and bring structured criteria.
  • Feedback loops: When something “feels off,” invite System 2 to investigate.

How to Use It

In Inside Out, Riley is overwhelmed by competing emotions after a move across the country. Joy tries to maintain control, acting fast to keep things upbeat. But as everything spirals, it’s not the quick responses that help her adapt—it’s the slower, deeper integration of Sadness that brings healing. Her emotions learn to cooperate rather than react. It’s a beautiful metaphor for System 1 and System 2: fast isn’t always wrong, but without reflective thinking, we miss the truth underneath.

Here’s how to balance the two:

  • Name the system: Is this a snap judgment or slow reasoning?
  • Delay high-stakes decisions: Sleep on it or walk it out to invite deeper analysis.
  • Build cross-checks: Let intuition speak, but verify with data.
  • Train both sides: System 1 learns through pattern exposure; System 2 sharpens through conscious reflection.

Next Steps

Notice when your brain jumps to a conclusion. Pause and label it: fast or slow? Then decide if the stakes warrant a second pass.

Where It Came From

The fast/slow framework was developed by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. It laid the foundation for behavioral economics and changed our thinking. Their work revealed that many of our errors aren’t random—they’re predictable outcomes of relying too heavily on fast thinking in the wrong moments.

Until next time, keep exploring and questioning. Your unique perspective is your greatest asset.

Think Independently, JC

Share or Join 👉

Re:Mind with Juan Carlos

Re:Mind is a weekly newsletter exploring mental models and frameworks that help you think clearly and make better decisions. Each week, I share practical insights and tools that transform complex ideas into wisdom you can apply immediately. Join me in making better decisions, together.

Read more from Re:Mind with Juan Carlos

Hello Reader, A few weeks ago, I blocked off a Saturday to work on some core updates to the Re:Mind deck. No meetings. No email. Just headphones and focus. And I got more done in four hours than I had in the previous four days. That’s the power of Deep Work—extended periods of distraction-free focus where real progress gets made. Deep Work creates the conditions for clarity, flow, and original thinking. When we protect our attention, we recover our best ideas. I’ve loaded 100 of the most...

Hello Reader, A few weeks ago, I was about to simplify an onboarding step in my app that felt clunky—an extra screen no one needed. I was ready to cut it to speed things up. But before I scrapped it, I paused. Why was it there in the first place? Turns out that step wasn’t just friction. It included an authentication check that helped prevent drop-off and improved conversions. Removing it would have quietly broken the system. That’s Chesterton’s Fence in action: don’t remove a fence until you...

Hello Reader, After wrapping up the Kickstarter campaign for Re:Mind, I met with my personal board of directors to discuss what should come next. We’re moving into production for the deck and planning updates to the app, but the path beyond that was foggy. I had been focused on funnels, lead magnets, and tactical marketing—but they gently redirected me to the harder truth. The signals were promising, they said, but it was time to ask the deeper question: who is this really for? Defining my...